Booster v2 — The Upgrade
The first version of the Booster worked for Stefan, Tom, and Henning. The core was right. But the format was brutal.
So I sat down and built version 2.
What Changed
Automatic data flow. In v1, you had to copy your answers manually from one page to the next. Copy & paste. 80 pages long. In v2, your answers feed automatically into the next steps. Enter once — the rest flows.
Prompts that go deeper. The questions in v1 were good. The ones in v2 were better. Every question was designed to dig one layer deeper. Not "What's your offer?" but "Why would someone wake up at 3 a.m. and Google your offer?"
Checklists after every phase. In v1, you never knew if you were ready for the next step. In v2: a checklist at the end of each phase. Everything checked off? Move on. Not? Go back.
Wording library. Real customer language placed right next to the optimized marketing copy. You see what your customer says — and next to it, what you should say.
The Numbers
- 80+ pages (grown from v1)
- 6 phases with checklists
- Time per run: 2–3 days (down from 5)
- Cost to me: ~40 hours of development, €0 in tools
The Feedback
I sent v2 to my list. The reactions were consistently positive — but always with the same caveat:
"Alex, this is amazing — but it's not easy and it eats up all my time."
Better than v1. Still a jackhammer. The format was the problem — not the content.
What I Learned
Iteration is not innovation. v2 was better than v1. But it was the same thing in a nicer dress. Sometimes you don't need a better version — you need a completely different format. It took me months to understand that.
💡 What this means for you:
If your product works but nobody uses it — stop improving it. Ask instead: Is the format right? Sometimes the answer isn't "make it better." It's "make it different."